Proposed by:
Requested amount:
0 DOT

#1548 · Please vote NAY

In light of the feedback from community (credits: Cris and Shawn) — I realized I failed to deliver value to justify the costs to DOT holders and hence have decided to rescind this proposal and work to generate the value first.

I sincerely apologise to the community for falling short here, I shall work continually and do whatever it takes to deliver on the promised value and rebuild trust.

Read more
StatusDeciding · 21d
100%Nay
Aye (0)
0 DOT
Nay (94)
24.73M DOT
Decision6 / 28d
0.0%5.03%
4.02%Support Threshold
0Support Threshold
Support(0.00%)
≈ 5K DOT
Issuance
≈ 1.56B DOT
Vote
May 5

Good day there! Thank you for your proposal. I`m quite concerned with the request that Polkassembly is submitting on-chain.

Since the last big request, nothing has changed on the Polk assembly side.

I already voted NAY last time, and since then, the Polk assembly continue to ask for money without hearing feedback and changing anything, nothing will change from my side either. Clear NAY.

CrisOpenGuildMay 1

I voted NAY because Dotcodeschool is overprice development with very low commit (you can check the codebase) and extremely low in distribution. Paying for this simple development 250k$ (last tranche and this tranche in combined) is so damn wild. Frankly our team has been following this case for awhile, we followed the github to see if things change and the project being pushed with more courses, etc etc and more distribution to developers community.

But unfortunately All I see has been a simple app being built and waiting for someone to pick up and do what they want.

Powered by Subsocial