Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Small Tipper track requires 30% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received one aye and six nay votes from nine available members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

> In the referendum, the majority of voters expressed their opposition to the tip request, citing concerns about its accuracy and relevance, particularly referencing existing community efforts and documentation. Many aligned with the critical comments made by others, emphasizing the potential risk of setting a precedent for future, less substantial requests. While one voter acknowledged the effort behind the proposal, they raised concerns about the implications of supporting short-form content. Only one voter supported the request, appreciating its aim to engage a new audience.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Appreciate it, but this is asking too much given the level and uniqueness of the work involved. REEEEEEEEEE DAO

To avoid comments from those who mention that "The cost of the reward is too high," I suggest you share a few things:

+Mention the effort it took you to create the tutorial.

+Bitfrost has mentioned some clarifications regarding the incorrect procedure you developed. Could you clarify that?

+Can you share any way to articulate the impact or usability of what you created?

This could be helpful in understanding the request estimate.

Dear proposer, Trustless Core has voted NAY.

The cost of the TIP reward for a single piece of content is very high; this type of technical/theoretical content is seen daily from different content creators on X. However, the curation method for calculating the 200 DOT reward for a single piece is very high. We recommend transferring this piece of content to the content curation bounty on Wagmedia.

Best Regards

Trustless Core.

Many thanks for your proposal, ET!

The tweet from NRL (@nrlartt) contains roughly 23 sentences. That works out to about 8.7 DOT, or $34.63 per sentence. If we very generously assume that NRL spent 5 minutes writing each sentence, that implies an hourly rate of around $415. While we welcome every contribution to Polkadot, the cost‑benefit ratio for this proposal is unfortunately so poor that we’ll refrain from a deeper analysis. In any case, anyone can review the documentation (see SuperDupont’s comment). Alternatively, you could simply ask an AI the following question:

Can you give me a detailed, beginner-friendly step-by-step guide on converting DOT to vDOT on the Bifrost platform, obtaining BNC for gas fees, and minting vDOT?

🔹🔷🔹 vonFlandern 🔹🔷🔹 has therefore voted with: ** NAY **

Our methodology aims to analyze and evaluate OpenGov proposals objectively, effectively, and transparently, establishing clear decision-making foundations for our votes while making our process visible to the community.

Hi, Thomas, community Lead of Bifrost

People should vote NAY to this tip proposal. 1/ It doesn’t worth 200 DOT. The whole documentation is available on our docs here https://docs.bifrost.io/dapp-tutorials-and-use-cases/liquid-staking-on-bifrost and in our support website here https://notion.bifrost.io/Stake-DOT-and-get-vDOT-84b4cd300c67427ab3da69f15b30738b

2/ The post is inaccurate. Step 4 is wrong and misleading for users. YOU DON’T NEED BNC ON BIFROST FOR FEES. -> we have flexible fees, just bring DOT that’s all you need.

3/ The post has very little engagement.

4/ The cost for the tweet is overestimated. I mean even Wagmedia wouldn’t have compensated this tweet for such an amount. On average, it would have been maybe 30 DOT maximum based on Wagmedia.

5/ Bifrost is running a Yapper campaign with 50 000 BNC (season 2), so this tweet falls under the eligibility. The content creator may receive around 700 BNC maximum for such a tweet (basic one), around 100$ not more. Not even sure it would be selected because it’s super basic.

So I’d like to thank Ethan for pushing content creators to produce some contents for Bifrost, but not at all cost. The Treasury shouldn’t be involved here, please let’s not start another KOL battle to spend such a crazy amount of DOT for a basic tweet, that’s not a good signal for Polkadot and also for us at Bifrost.

if the initiative is good, and we are thankful for that, we’d like the community not to support it for all the reasons described above.

Thx in advance.