I read the proposal docs, but couldn't find any metrics/KPIs how it is adding value to the Polkadot ecosystem? Can you please clarify?
Nice to read from you again :)
Thanks for checking out the proposal docs!
Since our last proposal, we’ve added close to 40,000 new builders who are diving into Polkadot’s tech, largely because of how easy we’ve made it to get started. Below are some key metrics showing the activity that’s running through Apillon onto the various parachains.
Now that Coretime is live, this activity means parachains need to buy Coretime to run on the relay chain, creating real value for the ecosystem. Hope this gives a clearer picture of how we’re contributing to Polkadot’s growth! Let us know if you have any more questions.
Thanks!
Hello! I have some questions and comments:
What are the projected maintenance costs once these improvements are implemented, and how do you plan to cover them in the future?
Are there long-term plans to reduce reliance on the Polkadot Treasury and achieve financial self-sufficiency? If so, what strategies are you considering implementing (e.g., transaction fees, subscription models)?
How do you plan to measure and improve user experience and adoption among developers? Have you conducted user studies or community surveys to identify necessary improvements?
Are you not going to include a marketing plan for Apillon? I think it's essential to attract new users, with plenty of tutorial videos and a greater presence on social media. I once read that "the most well-known wins over the best," and it's very true, so please keep that in mind.
Happy to answer your questions :)
Maintenance Costs and Treasury Reliance:
Apillon is committed to building an open-source SaaS platform, and while we currently rely partially on the Treasury to support our generous freemium model, this is essential to attract developers to the Polkadot ecosystem with competitive rates compared to providers like Thirdweb, Moralis, and Alchemy. As we convert enough freemium users into paid users, our goal is to sustain the freemium option independently of Treasury support.
Path to Self-sufficiency:
Our plan is to achieve self-sufficiency within 1-2 years through subscription-based revenue. As our user base grows, we’ll refine our pricing plans to remain competitive and financially sustainable.
User Experience and Adoption:
We’re dedicated to improving UX and adoption through continuous monitoring, including tracking user sessions via Hotjar to understand drop-offs and improve the experience. We also engage our community through Q&As and our governance portal, where developers can suggest features and guide future updates.
Marketing Strategy:
We have a robust marketing pipeline, though it falls outside the scope of this proposal and will be funded via a marketing bounty. We’re continually enhancing our SEO, running ads on Google and X, and attending major events like WebSummit in Lisbon, where we’ll have a booth and keynote. Additionally, we produce and share tutorial videos on social media to inspire new projects on Apillon.
Hope this clarifies things! Happy to provide more details if needed :)
Hello! I have some questions and comments:
What are the projected maintenance costs once these improvements are implemented, and how do you plan to cover them in the future?
Are there long-term plans to reduce reliance on the Polkadot Treasury and achieve financial self-sufficiency? If so, what strategies are you considering implementing (e.g., transaction fees, subscription models)?
How do you plan to measure and improve user experience and adoption among developers? Have you conducted user studies or community surveys to identify necessary improvements?
Are you not going to include a marketing plan for Apillon? I think it's essential to attract new users, with plenty of tutorial videos and a greater presence on social media. I once read that "the most well-known wins over the best," and it's very true, so please keep that in mind.
I read the proposal docs, but couldn't find any metrics/KPIs how it is adding value to the Polkadot ecosystem? Can you please clarify?
Powered by Subsocial